sometimes i wonder does humans know why they are here in this world?
do we really know???
i mean REALLY! do u know?
is it just to live and let die :)
live and what then what.... work? pay bills? get maried? have kids? fight? argue? get seperated? get divorce? pray? being religious? (what is religious) make money? and more money? being greedy? war? and more war!
the simple answer to Y we are here is ....
SIMPLY to help one and another...
the CREATOR have ceated us in such a perfect manner biologically and physically!
One thing that the CREATOR let us do is to use our brain to live a life in this world..
Unfortunately, humans do not use their brains when comes to caring for each other...
Some how they think tht they need a reason to justify a simple HELP or assistance in any way towards another human being...
Is there a limit if u wanna help some one?
should there be a limit?
Is it really about to justify your reasons to HELP!
well i believe that if u wanna HELP some one there should not be any limit to the level that u wanna help ...
the world is the best place to live...i mean its the only place that we got... unless maybe later in the future where star treck or star wars is a reality :)
unfortunately the humans is the one who spoil the whole thing that the CREATOR have provided to us... i mean witrh war... starvation... fighting over belief system and religion... what more can i say... humans and their need to be right all the time!
think...
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Monday, June 7, 2010
Obama: will he loose his international support over Israel's issue?
The whole world was happy (well most of us) when Obama became the President of the United States of America... making him the CEO of the world leaders in making the 'power decisions'....
Of coz since he is in POWER... alot have been done to make america as the best place in the world... and his policies and bills have done good to most americans especially on the health benefits and all ...
Now he needs to continue his 'CHANGE' effort to make not just America as the best country to live in But the whole world should be safe and fair place to live in...
He now need to make an important decision of making a 'CHANGE' for the live of palestinians and making a turn of event of non-supportive of ISRAEL from now on...
I hope he, as the CEO of the world power will make the best decision and make the impossible ... possible!
I also pray that GOD will give him and other world power leaders to take a fair action against Israel and stop the sufferings of the palestinians once and for all!
The whole world is expecting for him to make a 'power decision' on the attack of Israel's raid of a Gaza-bound aid ship
Below is the article from the FT (financial times-middle east)
Of coz since he is in POWER... alot have been done to make america as the best place in the world... and his policies and bills have done good to most americans especially on the health benefits and all ...
Now he needs to continue his 'CHANGE' effort to make not just America as the best country to live in But the whole world should be safe and fair place to live in...
He now need to make an important decision of making a 'CHANGE' for the live of palestinians and making a turn of event of non-supportive of ISRAEL from now on...
I hope he, as the CEO of the world power will make the best decision and make the impossible ... possible!
I also pray that GOD will give him and other world power leaders to take a fair action against Israel and stop the sufferings of the palestinians once and for all!
The whole world is expecting for him to make a 'power decision' on the attack of Israel's raid of a Gaza-bound aid ship
Below is the article from the FT (financial times-middle east)
Israel rejects multinational inquiry
By Vita Bekker in Tel Aviv and Edward Luce in Washington
Published: June 6 2010 13:23 | Last updated: June 6 2010 17:46
Israel on Sunday flatly rejected a proposed international inquiry into its deadly commando raid of a Gaza-bound aid ship last week, in which nine activists were killed.
“Israel has the ability and the right to investigate itself, not to be investigated by any international board,” Michael Oren, Israel’s ambassador to the US, told Fox News Sunday.
“I don’t think the United States would want an international inquiry into its military activities in Afghanistan, for example.”
Mr Oren’s remarks came a day after Ban Ki-moon, the secretary-general of the United Nations, proposed establishing a multi-national probe that would be headed by Geoffrey Palmer, the former prime minister of New Zealand and a maritime law expert, according to Israeli government officials who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The offer called for the committee to include representatives from Israel, the US and Turkey, under whose flag the ship in which most of the violence took place was sailing.
Mr Ban’s offer followed criticism of the Obama administration’s role last week in blunting the UN Security Council’s response to the commando raid. A senior official for the Obama administration told the Financial Times that there were no “serious disagreements” between Israel and the US in their private talks over the composition of the panel.
But the White House official added: “What we are seeking is an Israeli investigation that is credible and transparent and would include an international element.”
Meanwhile, the government of Turkey, which has been at loggerheads with the US over its allegedly one-sided role in the crisis, on Sunday strongly backed Mr Ban’s proposal. “This is not an issue between Turkey and Israel, it is a problem between Israel and international community,” Ahmed Davutoglu, Turkey’s foreign minister, told CNN on Sunday. “It is a problem between Israel and international law”.
Mr Davutoglu added that he was disappointed with America’s role in the last week. “Until now, of course, we were expecting a much more proactive approach [from Mr Obama] in responding to this crisis.”
Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli’s prime minister, told cabinet ministers from his right-wing Likud party on Sunday that “nothing has been finalised or decided so far. We have to make these decisions calmly without the pressure of events,” according to a senior official who took part in the meeting.
In addition, Israel would not agree to a “Goldstone-like” inquiry of the raid, referring to the UN-mandated investigation headed by former South African judge Richard Goldstone into Israel’s three-week onslaught in the Gaza Strip that ended in January 2009. Israel had dismissed the resulting report, which had accused it and Hamas of war crimes, as biased and false.
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
sharat's birthday today!
My son, Sheikh Sharat Shah is 3 years old today :)
He had a great day at his school today with all his friends...
I ordered a BEN 10 cup cakes for all and they just loved it!
more photos coming soon!
He had a great day at his school today with all his friends...
I ordered a BEN 10 cup cakes for all and they just loved it!
more photos coming soon!
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
POVERTY in the almighty MALAYSIA!
just to share an article i read in sin chew:
Although I have in my travels seen abject poverty in such diverse places as Addis Ababa, Dhaka, Dar es Salaam, Kolkata, Mumbai and Manila, I must confess to a feeling of utter revulsion and anger when confronted by stark deprivation in our supposedly well-governed and prosperous Malaysia.
The pockets of rural poverty in the Malay heartlands of Kedah, Perlis, Kelantan and Terengganu are islands of prosperity compared to the scene that churned my stomach and assailed my sense of guilt and outrage when I first ventured into the Iban long houses on the majestic Rejang.
It is not enough that we have robbed them of their ancestral lands and impoverished them in the process, but we also felt constrained to strip them naked of any residual personal dignity that they might still have by introducing policies that have succeeded in reducing them to the fringes of mainstream economic life.
The Orang Asli tribes and the Orang Hulu, the Malays from the interior, have a great deal in common with their Dayak friends. For all we care, they are Malaysia’s forgotten people, but not quite. Whenever an election is underway, be it a by-election or a general election, they find themselves the centre of attention, in great demand by the rich and powerful, all claiming to love and care for them.
Before the day is out, they are the proud possessors of a handful of crisp 50 ringgit notes. Four or five hundred ringgit is a princely sum to them, a king’s ransom, no less, in exchange for their votes. If some of them have become cunning, manipulative supplicants and sacrificed their values for a fistful of ringgit, remember it is we who have corrupted them.
Years of exposure to extreme poverty and unbridled exploitation have rendered many of these once proud and noble people, nature’s gentlemen, inured and insensitive to their own traditional values and value systems. They are reduced to living from hand to mouth, on handouts, from day to day.
What a tragedy to befall a people whose only sin is to trust those sworn to protect their native rights. They are bewildered to find themselves dispossessed, as their land is taken away without as much as “by your leave” for commercial exploitation by the towkay friends of the powerful.
Talking to many of them, the Ibans, I mean, I believe the only way we can restore their pride and dignity is by providing opportunities for regular employment. We are dealing with an ancient people with a distinctive culture. Even those among them whose lives have taken on an urban aspect continue to cling strenuously to their traditional practices. We who are strong have a duty to help the weak by not foisting on the Ibans and others our culture of corruption and other despicable practices.
Some years ago, an Indonesian anti-corruption activist friend of mine visited our country during the 11th general elections, as part of a privately funded election observer mission. His group spent a great deal of time in Sarawak and Sabah and told me that he was shocked by the scale of vote buying.
I was greatly embarrassed by his revelation because at an anti-corruption conference in The Hague at which I was invited to speak and he was a participant some two months earlier, I had said that while vote buying was rampant in party elections, the practice was unknown in general and state elections.
I was unbelievably naïve to believe the Barisan Nasional government propaganda. The scale of vote-buying must have been so massive as to shock my Indonesian anti-corruption fighter, used as he was to living and working in a corruption-infested nation. It is not that easy to shock an Indonesian over a corruption issue. But unlike Malaysia, Indonesia is on the mend as far as fighting corruption is concerned. In Malaysia, on the contrary, it is in indecently robust health.
Malaysia is blessed with rich natural resources and poverty as we have seen in Sabah, Sarawak, Kedah, Perlis, Kelantan and Terengganu can only be explained in terms of governance grounded on corruption and political excesses. When we look at the personal wealth accumulated by Chief Minister Taib of Sarawak at one extremity and the Ibans at the other, one begins to wonder what the future holds for Malaysia. I am not at all sanguine.
The thieving and plundering by those in power must stop because, as history tells us, it is only a matter of time before the forbearance of the long suffering poor takes on an ugly aspect, with consequences too dreadful to contemplate. The Government of Malaysia and the state governments of Sabah and Sarawak in particular can alleviate poverty by governing in the sole interest of the people. Najib’s people first is under close public scrutiny. (By TUNKU ABDUL AZIZ/MySinchew)
MySinchew 2010.05.15
I hope PM can read this article and start the the action now !!!
yes i know that GTP is the solution so to speak but frankly i am not that happy with it as there so many important issues and implementation strategies develop by the team is very much doubtfull!
one of the key factor that they missed out is the 'caringness' of the disabled or wht the gov or the media like to labeled 'OKU'.... In their main pillar of CHANGE or TRANFORMATION they missed this out! duuring the launching of the GTP at sunway hotel few months ago i did point this out to the CEO of the GTP and his officers... ofcoz he told me tahnk you this and that but i still dont see much change have been done... i think an independent audit committee need to look at the GTP implementation process if not it will be just another IDEA goes down the drain coz of bad IMPLEMENTATION!
Although I have in my travels seen abject poverty in such diverse places as Addis Ababa, Dhaka, Dar es Salaam, Kolkata, Mumbai and Manila, I must confess to a feeling of utter revulsion and anger when confronted by stark deprivation in our supposedly well-governed and prosperous Malaysia.
The pockets of rural poverty in the Malay heartlands of Kedah, Perlis, Kelantan and Terengganu are islands of prosperity compared to the scene that churned my stomach and assailed my sense of guilt and outrage when I first ventured into the Iban long houses on the majestic Rejang.
It is not enough that we have robbed them of their ancestral lands and impoverished them in the process, but we also felt constrained to strip them naked of any residual personal dignity that they might still have by introducing policies that have succeeded in reducing them to the fringes of mainstream economic life.
The Orang Asli tribes and the Orang Hulu, the Malays from the interior, have a great deal in common with their Dayak friends. For all we care, they are Malaysia’s forgotten people, but not quite. Whenever an election is underway, be it a by-election or a general election, they find themselves the centre of attention, in great demand by the rich and powerful, all claiming to love and care for them.
Before the day is out, they are the proud possessors of a handful of crisp 50 ringgit notes. Four or five hundred ringgit is a princely sum to them, a king’s ransom, no less, in exchange for their votes. If some of them have become cunning, manipulative supplicants and sacrificed their values for a fistful of ringgit, remember it is we who have corrupted them.
Years of exposure to extreme poverty and unbridled exploitation have rendered many of these once proud and noble people, nature’s gentlemen, inured and insensitive to their own traditional values and value systems. They are reduced to living from hand to mouth, on handouts, from day to day.
What a tragedy to befall a people whose only sin is to trust those sworn to protect their native rights. They are bewildered to find themselves dispossessed, as their land is taken away without as much as “by your leave” for commercial exploitation by the towkay friends of the powerful.
Talking to many of them, the Ibans, I mean, I believe the only way we can restore their pride and dignity is by providing opportunities for regular employment. We are dealing with an ancient people with a distinctive culture. Even those among them whose lives have taken on an urban aspect continue to cling strenuously to their traditional practices. We who are strong have a duty to help the weak by not foisting on the Ibans and others our culture of corruption and other despicable practices.
Some years ago, an Indonesian anti-corruption activist friend of mine visited our country during the 11th general elections, as part of a privately funded election observer mission. His group spent a great deal of time in Sarawak and Sabah and told me that he was shocked by the scale of vote buying.
I was greatly embarrassed by his revelation because at an anti-corruption conference in The Hague at which I was invited to speak and he was a participant some two months earlier, I had said that while vote buying was rampant in party elections, the practice was unknown in general and state elections.
I was unbelievably naïve to believe the Barisan Nasional government propaganda. The scale of vote-buying must have been so massive as to shock my Indonesian anti-corruption fighter, used as he was to living and working in a corruption-infested nation. It is not that easy to shock an Indonesian over a corruption issue. But unlike Malaysia, Indonesia is on the mend as far as fighting corruption is concerned. In Malaysia, on the contrary, it is in indecently robust health.
Malaysia is blessed with rich natural resources and poverty as we have seen in Sabah, Sarawak, Kedah, Perlis, Kelantan and Terengganu can only be explained in terms of governance grounded on corruption and political excesses. When we look at the personal wealth accumulated by Chief Minister Taib of Sarawak at one extremity and the Ibans at the other, one begins to wonder what the future holds for Malaysia. I am not at all sanguine.
The thieving and plundering by those in power must stop because, as history tells us, it is only a matter of time before the forbearance of the long suffering poor takes on an ugly aspect, with consequences too dreadful to contemplate. The Government of Malaysia and the state governments of Sabah and Sarawak in particular can alleviate poverty by governing in the sole interest of the people. Najib’s people first is under close public scrutiny. (By TUNKU ABDUL AZIZ/MySinchew)
MySinchew 2010.05.15
I hope PM can read this article and start the the action now !!!
yes i know that GTP is the solution so to speak but frankly i am not that happy with it as there so many important issues and implementation strategies develop by the team is very much doubtfull!
one of the key factor that they missed out is the 'caringness' of the disabled or wht the gov or the media like to labeled 'OKU'.... In their main pillar of CHANGE or TRANFORMATION they missed this out! duuring the launching of the GTP at sunway hotel few months ago i did point this out to the CEO of the GTP and his officers... ofcoz he told me tahnk you this and that but i still dont see much change have been done... i think an independent audit committee need to look at the GTP implementation process if not it will be just another IDEA goes down the drain coz of bad IMPLEMENTATION!
Sibu: after the by-election
SIBU by election result was a slap to BN leaders...
Opposition received 2942 more votes compared to the 8 March general elections while the Sarawak United People's Party (SUPP) or (BN) received only 691 less votes. DAP was able to win as 70% Chinese voters gave their support to DAP, the party was able to gain its first victory in Sarawak.
Basically Sibu is just one of the district that is poorly develop in Sarawak... in fact there is so many district in Malaysia as a whole tht are desperately need of development and growth.
The Rakyat living in this locations have been waiting for ages for some creative and innovative ideas from the government to develop their homeground so that their livelyhood will become better and they too can be part of the malaysian business eco-system instead of trying their level best to survive in life in their petty daily jobs and business...
BN win in hulu selangor for me is by pure luck as the margin of their victory is very very small! BN's luck ran out in Sibu simply bcoz the Rakyat has spoken! they want a change as for ages they have been waiting for development as even their local issues like floods etc have not been resolved and lots of lifestocks, etc lost whenever big floods occur.
I still believe in BN but i really think that PM should let go a few no result and no sincere heart leaders and replace them with leaders who believe in honesty as a way of life and will develop their nation with the interest of the Rakyat and not his pockets and his ego!
The big question now is ... is it logical for PM to 'locate' these 'saints'?
is it logical for this appointed 'saints' to do their job without 'making money' for themselves so that they can 'buy' their way in and out situations, etc...???
The answer is simple...
Whenever you do things with good heart and good intention (NIAT) anything u do will be blessed by the CREATOR and any obstacle comes in your way...u will have the wisdon to handle it with open mind and with full of calm!
on other note; Sometimes i like to read and get facts from our local chinese newspapers to compare with our english/bm papers :)
below (italic) was taken from www.mysinchew.com
18 may 2010; Pakatan Rakyat (PR) was really annoyed recently. It suffered a defeat in the Hulu Selangor by-election while some of its members withdrew or switched parties, and a PKR Member of Parliament (MP) even revealed corruption in the Selangor-owned Kumpulan Semesta Sdn Bhd (KSSB). Barisan Nasional (BN) had been ridiculing it but the victory in the Sibu by-election this time has greatly boosted its morale.
The victory in the Sibu by-election has an enormous political significance to PR. It shows that PR is still influential and it is not that easy for BN to retrieve the two-thirds majority.
Wong Ho Leng received 2942 more votes compared to the 8 March general elections while the Sarawak United People's Party (SUPP) received only 691 less votes. DAP was able to win because the turnout rate has increased by 3%. As 70% Chinese voters gave their support to DAP, the party was able to gain its first victory in Sarawak.
There are national and local factors for BN's defeat:
1.Chinese voters hope to consolidate the two-party system: As BN is proceeding forward, PR's parliamentary seats have been reduced to 77. The withdrawal of Wangsa Maju MP Wee Choo Keong from PKR before the polling started has caused BN a step closer to the two-thirds majority.
It is believed that some voters voted for PR as they wanted to maintain checks and balances. Interests of the minority will, after all, be better protected under a two-party system.
2.Local factors: Even though Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak had visited Sibu for three times, the "1Malaysia" concept takes time to bring effects and thus, it is unable to offset the impact of local factors.
Sibu has been lack of development in recent years and the flooding problem has not yet been resolved. These are issues concerned by voters.
3.DAP's election strategy is effective: After learning a lesson from the Hulu Selangor by-election, DAP started its election mechanism earlier this time. Under the leadership of party adviser Lim Kit Siang, leaders of all levels were fully mobilised to fight for votes during the election campaign. And their efforts bore fruits.
DAP has become an election expert after experiencing a lot of election battles over all these years, particularly the battle in Tanjung, Penang. DAP's motto of "Sibu for change" has won the hearts of the voters.
In contrast, SUPP's campaign strategy has failed to keep up the pace of voters. Chinese voters have been immune to the Islamic state issue. It is useless to play up the Islamic state issue now.
DAP's victory in the by-election has improved its status in PR as when PR is gradually defeating, it has won the Sibu parliamentary seat and at the same time, it has become the largest component party of PR with 29 parliamentary seats.
The victory in Sibu has also strengthened the cooperation of PR's component parties in Sarawak. It can help them to resolve the conflicts earlier.
However, PR should not conclude based on only a by-election that the 8 March political tsunami has reached Sabah and Sarawak, giving it an opportunity to seize the Sarawak state power, as Sibu is a Chinese constituency but Iban and Melanau voters are still supporting BN.
If PR is unable to spread its message of change to inland areas, BN will still be able to hold tight the state power of Sarawak.
BN won the Hulu Selangor by-election but lost the Sibu by-election. It shows that the BN government still needs to step up the efforts to reform. Particularly, it needs to focus on the implementation of the New economic Model (NEM) and 10th Malaysia Plan to avoid too many of political disputes.
Politics is a long journey and we should not make a conclusion based on only a by-election. Both BN and PR still need to work harder. (By LIM SUE GOAN/ Translated by SOONG PHUI JEE/ Sin Chew Daily)
Opposition received 2942 more votes compared to the 8 March general elections while the Sarawak United People's Party (SUPP) or (BN) received only 691 less votes. DAP was able to win as 70% Chinese voters gave their support to DAP, the party was able to gain its first victory in Sarawak.
Basically Sibu is just one of the district that is poorly develop in Sarawak... in fact there is so many district in Malaysia as a whole tht are desperately need of development and growth.
The Rakyat living in this locations have been waiting for ages for some creative and innovative ideas from the government to develop their homeground so that their livelyhood will become better and they too can be part of the malaysian business eco-system instead of trying their level best to survive in life in their petty daily jobs and business...
BN win in hulu selangor for me is by pure luck as the margin of their victory is very very small! BN's luck ran out in Sibu simply bcoz the Rakyat has spoken! they want a change as for ages they have been waiting for development as even their local issues like floods etc have not been resolved and lots of lifestocks, etc lost whenever big floods occur.
I still believe in BN but i really think that PM should let go a few no result and no sincere heart leaders and replace them with leaders who believe in honesty as a way of life and will develop their nation with the interest of the Rakyat and not his pockets and his ego!
The big question now is ... is it logical for PM to 'locate' these 'saints'?
is it logical for this appointed 'saints' to do their job without 'making money' for themselves so that they can 'buy' their way in and out situations, etc...???
The answer is simple...
Whenever you do things with good heart and good intention (NIAT) anything u do will be blessed by the CREATOR and any obstacle comes in your way...u will have the wisdon to handle it with open mind and with full of calm!
on other note; Sometimes i like to read and get facts from our local chinese newspapers to compare with our english/bm papers :)
below (italic) was taken from www.mysinchew.com
18 may 2010; Pakatan Rakyat (PR) was really annoyed recently. It suffered a defeat in the Hulu Selangor by-election while some of its members withdrew or switched parties, and a PKR Member of Parliament (MP) even revealed corruption in the Selangor-owned Kumpulan Semesta Sdn Bhd (KSSB). Barisan Nasional (BN) had been ridiculing it but the victory in the Sibu by-election this time has greatly boosted its morale.
The victory in the Sibu by-election has an enormous political significance to PR. It shows that PR is still influential and it is not that easy for BN to retrieve the two-thirds majority.
Wong Ho Leng received 2942 more votes compared to the 8 March general elections while the Sarawak United People's Party (SUPP) received only 691 less votes. DAP was able to win because the turnout rate has increased by 3%. As 70% Chinese voters gave their support to DAP, the party was able to gain its first victory in Sarawak.
There are national and local factors for BN's defeat:
1.Chinese voters hope to consolidate the two-party system: As BN is proceeding forward, PR's parliamentary seats have been reduced to 77. The withdrawal of Wangsa Maju MP Wee Choo Keong from PKR before the polling started has caused BN a step closer to the two-thirds majority.
It is believed that some voters voted for PR as they wanted to maintain checks and balances. Interests of the minority will, after all, be better protected under a two-party system.
2.Local factors: Even though Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak had visited Sibu for three times, the "1Malaysia" concept takes time to bring effects and thus, it is unable to offset the impact of local factors.
Sibu has been lack of development in recent years and the flooding problem has not yet been resolved. These are issues concerned by voters.
3.DAP's election strategy is effective: After learning a lesson from the Hulu Selangor by-election, DAP started its election mechanism earlier this time. Under the leadership of party adviser Lim Kit Siang, leaders of all levels were fully mobilised to fight for votes during the election campaign. And their efforts bore fruits.
DAP has become an election expert after experiencing a lot of election battles over all these years, particularly the battle in Tanjung, Penang. DAP's motto of "Sibu for change" has won the hearts of the voters.
In contrast, SUPP's campaign strategy has failed to keep up the pace of voters. Chinese voters have been immune to the Islamic state issue. It is useless to play up the Islamic state issue now.
DAP's victory in the by-election has improved its status in PR as when PR is gradually defeating, it has won the Sibu parliamentary seat and at the same time, it has become the largest component party of PR with 29 parliamentary seats.
The victory in Sibu has also strengthened the cooperation of PR's component parties in Sarawak. It can help them to resolve the conflicts earlier.
However, PR should not conclude based on only a by-election that the 8 March political tsunami has reached Sabah and Sarawak, giving it an opportunity to seize the Sarawak state power, as Sibu is a Chinese constituency but Iban and Melanau voters are still supporting BN.
If PR is unable to spread its message of change to inland areas, BN will still be able to hold tight the state power of Sarawak.
BN won the Hulu Selangor by-election but lost the Sibu by-election. It shows that the BN government still needs to step up the efforts to reform. Particularly, it needs to focus on the implementation of the New economic Model (NEM) and 10th Malaysia Plan to avoid too many of political disputes.
Politics is a long journey and we should not make a conclusion based on only a by-election. Both BN and PR still need to work harder. (By LIM SUE GOAN/ Translated by SOONG PHUI JEE/ Sin Chew Daily)
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Politic-a-bit: Hulu Selangor by election
I do not like to talk about politics much but after reading so many blogs, news and articles for the past 2 weeks on the election i just need to blog on this issue...
Barisan Nasional won the by-election by a 'majority' of 1,725.
I wonder why almost all keep on using the word 'majority' as the word suppose to use is just 'merely' 1,725 and that's it!
BN got 24,997 votes, the opposition managed to get 23,272 votes. Obviously the Rakyat is still very much 'supporting' the opposition...
The question is WHY BN only won by one thousand plus from a a large constituency of 63,701!
The task force and the leaders of BN must do a FULL study on this as it is very important to NOT just thinking about winning and only provide spur moment of hope to the people... The leaders should start to 'turun padang' every week and listen to the voice of the Rakyat and NOT only turun padang and smile only during elections...
I have a second family in Sik, Kedah... and my 'mom's' house had been a victim of a road development work.. the work was not done well and muds slide goes in her house and mud flood have ruin her furnitures etc... she have lodged complaints to various authority including the state minister's office then but no action been taken... i did ask her why does this happen; and the only thing she could say was the MB do not turun padang and only listen to his advisors in his office only and only been receiving 'good news' from the rakyat and not the real news...
I really hope now since BN have won back Perak, hulu selangor and maybe more constituency >>> please make sure leaders of BN << do not take the Rakyat for granted... be sincere and honest in delivering your job as a leader for the people and not busy being bias
Barisan Nasional won the by-election by a 'majority' of 1,725.
I wonder why almost all keep on using the word 'majority' as the word suppose to use is just 'merely' 1,725 and that's it!
BN got 24,997 votes, the opposition managed to get 23,272 votes. Obviously the Rakyat is still very much 'supporting' the opposition...
The question is WHY BN only won by one thousand plus from a a large constituency of 63,701!
The task force and the leaders of BN must do a FULL study on this as it is very important to NOT just thinking about winning and only provide spur moment of hope to the people... The leaders should start to 'turun padang' every week and listen to the voice of the Rakyat and NOT only turun padang and smile only during elections...
I have a second family in Sik, Kedah... and my 'mom's' house had been a victim of a road development work.. the work was not done well and muds slide goes in her house and mud flood have ruin her furnitures etc... she have lodged complaints to various authority including the state minister's office then but no action been taken... i did ask her why does this happen; and the only thing she could say was the MB do not turun padang and only listen to his advisors in his office only and only been receiving 'good news' from the rakyat and not the real news...
I really hope now since BN have won back Perak, hulu selangor and maybe more constituency >>> please make sure leaders of BN << do not take the Rakyat for granted... be sincere and honest in delivering your job as a leader for the people and not busy being bias
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Making CHANGE
"Our lives begin to end when we become silent on the things that matter" - Martin Luther King Jr
Dont you just wanna ask him what does he means by that?
Must one die or suffers to make a change in life?
Must one be political to make a change in life?
I sometimes wonder why do people working so hard to be different...
Most of them is geared by EGO so ppl will so call admire them just simply bcoz they are diferent
But one thing that i do not understand is tht why cant leaders make the necessary CHANGES for the benefit of others and not for what they think is right...
I think leaders should start to be a good listener instead of good doers!
This is what make the people keep on disapointed with the government or leaders as they just dont LISTEN! and keep on doing what they or their 'advisors' think is right!
Listen leaders...Listen... then study the issues well with good advices by true genuine advisors... then only react and take actions...followed by evaluations..etc!
Dont you just wanna ask him what does he means by that?
Must one die or suffers to make a change in life?
Must one be political to make a change in life?
I sometimes wonder why do people working so hard to be different...
Most of them is geared by EGO so ppl will so call admire them just simply bcoz they are diferent
But one thing that i do not understand is tht why cant leaders make the necessary CHANGES for the benefit of others and not for what they think is right...
I think leaders should start to be a good listener instead of good doers!
This is what make the people keep on disapointed with the government or leaders as they just dont LISTEN! and keep on doing what they or their 'advisors' think is right!
Listen leaders...Listen... then study the issues well with good advices by true genuine advisors... then only react and take actions...followed by evaluations..etc!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
